Polymer Technology Selection
Which Polymer 3D Printing Technology Is Best for Your Application?
Share article
Choosing the right polymer 3D printing technology is essential for achieving optimal performance, cost efficiency, and part quality. With several methods available, each offering unique advantages and trade-offs, it’s crucial to understand which process best fits your application.
In this guide, we compare the three most widely used industrial polymer 3D printing methods:
- Material Extrusion (ME/FDM)
- Vat Polymerization (SLA/DLP)
- Powder Bed Fusion (SLS/MJF)
Choosing the right process: more than one answer
This guide serves as a starting point, but no single 3D printing technology is always the best choice. In many applications, multiple processes can achieve the desired results, each with trade-offs in cost, accuracy, strength, and post-processing. Additionally, there is a wide variation within each technology—for example, SLA quality differs significantly between low-cost desktop printers and industrial machines. Material selection also plays a crucial role, as for example fiber-reinforced extrusion parts significantly outperform basic materials in strength. To make an informed decision, always consider both the printing technology and the material properties together.
Overview of 3D Printing Technologies
Material Extrusion, Vat Polymerization, and Powder Bed Fusion are among the most mature and widely used polymer 3D printing technologies. Each process offers distinct advantages, making them suitable for different applications – from low-cost prototyping to high-precision components and strong, production-ready parts.
In this section, we will provide an overview of each technology, explore their key variations, and highlight their strengths and limitations to help you understand which process best fits your application needs.
Material Extrusion (ME):
Cost effective, accessible and versatile
Key Advantages:
✔️ Low-cost and accessible (widely used for prototyping)
✔️ Broad material selection for functional applications
✔️ High-strenght possible (e.g. PEEK and Fiber-reinforcement)
Limitations:
❌ Lower resolution & visible layer lines
❌ Weaker interlayer bonding (anisotropic strength)
❌ Requires support structures for overhangs
💡 Best suited for:
Basic prototypes, jigs & fixtures, tooling, and proof-of-concept models
Filament ME
Process: A thermoplastic filament (PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU, Nylon) is melted and extruded through a nozzle, layering the material to form a part.
Related Terminologies:
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)
Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)
Pellet ME
Process: Pellet-based Material Extrusion is a high-throughput variation of traditional filament-based extrusion, using pelletized feedstock instead of filament
Continuous Fiber ME
Process: Continuous Fiber ME is a variation of filament extrusion, where a continuous fiber—such as carbon or glass – is embedded within a thermoplastic matrix during printing.
VAT Polymerization:
High-Precision, Smooth Surface Finishes
Key Advantages:
✔️ High-detail resolution for intricate features
✔️ Smooth, injection-mold-like surface finish
✔️ Good for small, precise, aesthetic components
Limitations:
❌ Requires post-processing (washing, curing, support removal)
❌ Brittle materials (resins are less impact-resistant than thermoplastics)
❌ Limited functional applications due to material properties
💡 Best suited for:
Dental models, medical devices, jewelry, high-detail prototypes, and master molds for casting
VAT Polymerization
Process: A UV laser selectively cures liquid resin, solidifying the object layer by layer.
Related Terminologies:
Sterelolithography (SLA)
Area-wise VAT Polymerization
Process: A digital light projector selectively cures liquid resin, solidifying the object layer by layer.
Related Terminologies:
Digital Light Processing (DLP)
Powder Bed Fusion (PBF):
High-Strength, Production-Ready Parts
Key Advantages:
✔️ No support structures needed (powder bed acts as support)
✔️ Strong, isotropic mechanical properties (ideal for functional parts)
✔️ Good for batch production of durable components
Limitations:
❌ Higher cost & complex powder handling
❌ Rougher surface finish compared to SLA
❌ Post-processing required (powder removal, finishing)
💡 Best suited for:
Functional prototypes, aerospace and automotive parts, production components, and end-use goods
Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Process: A thermoplastic filament (PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU, Nylon) is melted and extruded through a nozzle, layering the material to form a part.
Related Terminologies:
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
Thermal Powder Bed Fusion
Process: A thermoplastic filament (PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU, Nylon) is melted and extruded through a nozzle, layering the material to form a part.
Related Terminologies:
Multi Jet Fusion (MJF)
High-Speed Sintering (HSS)
Key Factors to Consider When Choosing a Technology
Selecting the right technology requires balancing accuracy, strength, material compatibility, and cost. Each process offers unique advantages and trade-offs that impact the final part’s performance, surface quality, and production efficiency.
The table below provides a quick comparison of these technologies, highlighting key factors such as resolution, durability, material options, post-processing needs, and cost-efficiency to help guide your decision-making.
wpDataTable with provided ID not found!
Post-processing considerations
Post-processing is an essential step in 3D printing that impacts cost, workflow efficiency, and final part quality. The level of post-processing required varies significantly between Material Extrusion, Vat Polymerization, and Powder Bed Fusion, affecting both time and effort in the production process.
- Material Extrusion: Minimal post-processing, occasional sanding or coating for smoother surfaces.
- Vat Polymerization: Requires washing, UV curing, and support removal; some resins need additional UV exposure for full strength.
- Powder Bed Fusion: Requires powder removal; can be bead blasted or dyed for better surface finish.
Understanding these post-processing needs is critical when selecting a technology that aligns with your application’s efficiency and quality requirements.
Applications: Which Technology Should You Choose?
Low-cost prototyping, jigs & fixtures
Material Extrusion
✔️ Best for: Functional testing, jigs & fixtures, educational use
✔️ Material Options: PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU, Nylon
✔️ Limitations: Lower resolution, weaker interlayer bonding
High-detail, aesthetic prototypes
Vat Polymerization
✔️ Best for: Jewelry, dental, medical, casting masters, visual prototypes
✔️ Material Options: Standard, tough, flexible, clear, and dental resins
✔️ Limitations: Brittle materials, requires post-processing
Strong, production-ready parts
Powder Bed Fusion
✔️ Best for: Aerospace, automotive, industrial applications
✔️ Material Options: Nylon PA12, PA11, TPU, Polypropylene
✔️ Limitations: Higher cost, rougher surface finish
Conclusion: Making the Right Choice
Selecting the right polymer 3D printing technology depends on your specific needs, budget, and required material properties. Some key takeaways:
- If cost-efficiency is the top priority, Material Extrusion might be best choice.
- If fine detail and smooth surfaces are essential, Vat Polymerization could be ideal.
- If strong, functional, and production-ready parts are needed, Powder Bed Fusion is a good candidate.
- If there is more than one option, make a trade-off between cost and functionality.
- Careful material selection is just as important as choosing the right process!
Further Slideshows
Training
Increase your 3D Printing knowledge
Would you like to further increase your 3D Printing knowledge?
You can try out the AM Fundamentals course of the AMPOWER Academy free of charge
AM Fundamentals Trial
Understand the most important topics to get started with Additive Manufacturing
